http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:39:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-71143 Curious Guest Sun, 05 Jun 2011 04:21:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-71143 What breed was that last dog? What breed was that last dog?

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-70148 brooke Wed, 25 May 2011 03:02:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-70148 a good portion of the constant incoming information is cut out by the brain. during times of emergencies more information is logged and thus humans remember events in this [referring to the video above] sort of slow-mo fashion littered with normally missed minute details. so in a sense, humans do see in frames, or at least remember their sight in frames. vision, at least from memory standpoint, is strung together bits of information much like a movie or video. And vision could entirely be considered working memory altogether when perceived by the brain even in the present...so humans actually may see (in all present sense of the word) in frames, even though the eye constantly sends information to the brain. And I agree with theHerald; please don't be so rude with your arguments. a good portion of the constant incoming information is cut out by the brain. during times of emergencies more information is logged and thus humans remember events in this [referring to the video above] sort of slow-mo fashion littered with normally missed minute details. so in a sense, humans do see in frames, or at least remember their sight in frames. vision, at least from memory standpoint, is strung together bits of information much like a movie or video. And vision could entirely be considered working memory altogether when perceived by the brain even in the present…so humans actually may see (in all present sense of the word) in frames, even though the eye constantly sends information to the brain. And I agree with theHerald; please don’t be so rude with your arguments.

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-63736 Leigh Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:12:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-63736 Is that a boxer at the 00:58 sec mark? Is that a boxer at the 00:58 sec mark?

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-48926 Moltobene11 Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:21:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-48926 i dont know about you but i can track objects and frisbees pretty well man you dont need to see more frames to track things like that i dont know about you but i can track objects and frisbees pretty well man you dont need to see more frames to track things like that

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-48416 10 Most Popular PetaPixel Posts of 2010 Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:41:02 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-48416 [...] Dogs Filmed at 1000 Frames Per Second [...] [...] Dogs Filmed at 1000 Frames Per Second [...]

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-48215 jessca Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:51:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-48215 I think they were saying that people can view 4 (?) frames per second and see motion, but if a dog were to see the same clip, they would see a slide show. I think they were saying that people can view 4 (?) frames per second and see motion, but if a dog were to see the same clip, they would see a slide show.

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-47209 Matheran89 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:30:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-47209 Dogs see more frames than us? I just lol'd. Dogs see more frames than us? I just lol’d.

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-47151 Appeltaart Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:43:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-47151 I had this exact idea the other day while playing fetch with my dog the other day needless to say I don't have a high speed videocamera :( I had this exact idea the other day while playing fetch with my dog the other day
needless to say I don’t have a high speed videocamera :(

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-46958 Anonymous Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:37:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-46958 It'd be wiser for you to begin your arguments more politely, with more aplomb. It’d be wiser for you to begin your arguments more politely, with more aplomb.

]]> http://www.petapixel.com/2010/03/02/dogs-filmed-at-1000-frames-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-46941 P_j_judge Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:11:00 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=7159#comment-46941 You're bordering on pseudoscience of Chopra-esque proportions. Microexpression has nothing to do with how we see. Nor does it have to do with how your dog looks at you or why people are not photogenic. Microexpression is a very short involuntary facial expression when an intense emotion is suddenly felt. You’re bordering on pseudoscience of Chopra-esque proportions. Microexpression has nothing to do with how we see. Nor does it have to do with how your dog looks at you or why people are not photogenic. Microexpression is a very short involuntary facial expression when an intense emotion is suddenly felt.

]]>