<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Impossible Project May Not Be Possible After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plan ratowania filmów Polaroid nie wypali?</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>Plan ratowania filmów Polaroid nie wypali?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6342#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;The Impossible Project&#8221; ma szanse na powodzenie. Po podaniu tych informacji przez blog Petapixel firma zaprzeczyła wszystkiemu na Twitterze, twierdząc, że mają tylko chwilowe problemy z [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;The Impossible Project&#8221; ma szanse na powodzenie. Po podaniu tych informacji przez blog Petapixel firma zaprzeczyła wszystkiemu na Twitterze, twierdząc, że mają tylko chwilowe problemy z [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scintillescent</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>scintillescent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6342#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>because instax film sucks ass and it doesn&#039;t fit in polaroid cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because instax film sucks ass and it doesn&#39;t fit in polaroid cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwgray</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4689</link>
		<dc:creator>mwgray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6342#comment-4689</guid>
		<description>Actually that last paragraph of their release still sounds like they will have something to sell. Why make media kits if you have no product or any hope for a product.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heres hoping it was a supplier setback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually that last paragraph of their release still sounds like they will have something to sell. Why make media kits if you have no product or any hope for a product.</p>
<p>Heres hoping it was a supplier setback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zhang</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4687</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6342#comment-4687</guid>
		<description>So people can use their old Polaroid instant cameras again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So people can use their old Polaroid instant cameras again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave K</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/09/the-impossible-project-may-not-be-possible-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6342#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>Uuuhhh Fujifilm still makes Instax so why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uuuhhh Fujifilm still makes Instax so why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: files.petapixel.com

Served from: www.petapixel.com @ 2012-02-09 21:41:35 -->
