<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving JPEG Photos Hundreds of Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Descargando y subiendo el mismo video a Youtube 1000 veces &#124; Logit42</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-14006</link>
		<dc:creator>Descargando y subiendo el mismo video a Youtube 1000 veces &#124; Logit42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-14006</guid>
		<description>[...] tipo de experimentos no son nuevos; ya se habían efectuado con anterioridad al utilizar imágenes JPEG y ver como la compresión del [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tipo de experimentos no son nuevos; ya se habían efectuado con anterioridad al utilizar imágenes JPEG y ver como la compresión del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Sitting in a Room, YouTube Style</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-13857</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Sitting in a Room, YouTube Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-13857</guid>
		<description>[...] is similar to the JPG generation loss experiments we posted last year. Experiments with VHS generation loss are also pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is similar to the JPG generation loss experiments we posted last year. Experiments with VHS generation loss are also pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimgoldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-5329</link>
		<dc:creator>jimgoldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-5329</guid>
		<description>Here is another take on the same evaluation with a variety of patterns and photos to display the impact after 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 and 1024 rounds of compression. No video, but this has been online since 2005.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_compression.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_comp...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another take on the same evaluation with a variety of patterns and photos to display the impact after 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 and 1024 rounds of compression. No video, but this has been online since 2005.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_compression.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jmg-galleries.com/articles/jpeg_comp&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Roundup 02-14-2010 &#124; The Portfolio Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Roundup 02-14-2010 &#124; The Portfolio Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>[...] Saving JPEG Photos Hundreds of Times PetaPixel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saving JPEG Photos Hundreds of Times PetaPixel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo galvão</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo galvão</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>If you work with .jpeg this way...&lt;br&gt;.RAW is for you...&lt;br&gt;Just one question:&lt;br&gt;Do you print in .RAW? &lt;br&gt;even in 16 bit?&lt;br&gt;Oh, no? if you do not print in raw&lt;br&gt;why underestimate .JPEG?&lt;br&gt;I never use .raw...(in analog film times i used Chrome film, i could not have a mistake)&lt;br&gt;as JPEG..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sorry my bad english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you work with .jpeg this way&#8230;<br />.RAW is for you&#8230;<br />Just one question:<br />Do you print in .RAW? <br />even in 16 bit?<br />Oh, no? if you do not print in raw<br />why underestimate .JPEG?<br />I never use .raw&#8230;(in analog film times i used Chrome film, i could not have a mistake)<br />as JPEG..</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>sorry my bad english</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Roundup 02-14-2010</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Roundup 02-14-2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>[...] Saving JPEG Photos Hundreds of Times PetaPixel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saving JPEG Photos Hundreds of Times PetaPixel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>Although the compression will be for the worse it isn&#039;t necessarily inherent of the JPEG. There was another blog that showed that if you compare how you save the JPG you&#039;ll have different results. For instance if you save in Photoshop, you&#039;ll have worse results. Here&#039;s the link. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/cShovU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/cShovU&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the compression will be for the worse it isn&#39;t necessarily inherent of the JPEG. There was another blog that showed that if you compare how you save the JPG you&#39;ll have different results. For instance if you save in Photoshop, you&#39;ll have worse results. Here&#39;s the link. <a href="http://bit.ly/cShovU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cShovU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjw</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>bjw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>The face is well preserved because the compression happens in the areas where there is little variation. So, if we are mad enough to do 500 compressions, we lose the dull part of the picture, and keep the interesting part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The face is well preserved because the compression happens in the areas where there is little variation. So, if we are mad enough to do 500 compressions, we lose the dull part of the picture, and keep the interesting part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Links &#124; iffles.com</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4633</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Links &#124; iffles.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4633</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard how every time you open and resave a jpg file, you lose a bit of quality. To see that in action, check these out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard how every time you open and resave a jpg file, you lose a bit of quality. To see that in action, check these out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esta semana en Twitter: 06-02-2010 &#124; ceslava - Diseño y Formación</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/comment-page-1/#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator>Esta semana en Twitter: 06-02-2010 &#124; ceslava - Diseño y Formación</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=6108#comment-4620</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/ qué pasa si guardas un JPEG cientos de veces&#8230; # [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/" rel="nofollow">http://www.petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/</a> qué pasa si guardas un JPEG cientos de veces&#8230; # [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: files.petapixel.com

Served from: www.petapixel.com @ 2012-02-09 18:31:26 -->
