<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photos of the New Samsung Pseudo-DSLR System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanyan</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>APS-C isn&#039;t actually a definite sensor size - you&#039;ll notice that both Nikon and Canon cameras use an &quot;APS-C&quot; size sensor for cameras like the 7D or D40, but the D40&#039;s 1.5x APS-C sensor is actually larger than the 7D&#039;s 1.6x APS-C sensor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This Samsung system uses a 1.5x sensor, so it is bigger, albeit slightly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Canon and Nikon cameras tend to have above-average high-ISO performance, but as a consumer you should *never* make blanket judgements along the lines of &quot;Canon has a good reputation, their high-ISO should always be better than Camera brand X&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APS-C isn&#39;t actually a definite sensor size &#8211; you&#39;ll notice that both Nikon and Canon cameras use an &#8220;APS-C&#8221; size sensor for cameras like the 7D or D40, but the D40&#39;s 1.5x APS-C sensor is actually larger than the 7D&#39;s 1.6x APS-C sensor.</p>
<p>This Samsung system uses a 1.5x sensor, so it is bigger, albeit slightly.</p>
<p>Canon and Nikon cameras tend to have above-average high-ISO performance, but as a consumer you should *never* make blanket judgements along the lines of &#8220;Canon has a good reputation, their high-ISO should always be better than Camera brand X&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanyan</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3843</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>APS-C isn&#039;t actually a definite sensor size - you&#039;ll notice that both Nikon and Canon cameras use an &quot;APS-C&quot; size sensor for cameras like the 7D or D40, but the D40&#039;s 1.5x APS-C sensor is actually larger than the 7D&#039;s 1.6x APS-C sensor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This Samsung system uses a 1.5x sensor, so it is bigger, albeit slightly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Canon and Nikon cameras tend to have above-average high-ISO performance, but as a consumer you should *never* make blanket judgements along the lines of &quot;Canon has a good reputation, their high-ISO should always be better than Camera brand X&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APS-C isn&#39;t actually a definite sensor size &#8211; you&#39;ll notice that both Nikon and Canon cameras use an &#8220;APS-C&#8221; size sensor for cameras like the 7D or D40, but the D40&#39;s 1.5x APS-C sensor is actually larger than the 7D&#39;s 1.6x APS-C sensor.</p>
<p>This Samsung system uses a 1.5x sensor, so it is bigger, albeit slightly.</p>
<p>Canon and Nikon cameras tend to have above-average high-ISO performance, but as a consumer you should *never* make blanket judgements along the lines of &#8220;Canon has a good reputation, their high-ISO should always be better than Camera brand X&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildeel</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3554</link>
		<dc:creator>wildeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3554</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the fuss ... Panasonic and Olympus have had similar cameras on the market for some time now Or don&#039;t they count in this Nikon/Canon biased world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get the fuss &#8230; Panasonic and Olympus have had similar cameras on the market for some time now Or don&#39;t they count in this Nikon/Canon biased world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>After some searching, it would seem as if this camera uses an APS-C sensor--same as my 40D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, from personal experience, and from the reviews I have read, it would seem that moving away from Canon or Nikon means putting up with poor low-light performance, or relatively high noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some searching, it would seem as if this camera uses an APS-C sensor&#8211;same as my 40D.</p>
<p>But, from personal experience, and from the reviews I have read, it would seem that moving away from Canon or Nikon means putting up with poor low-light performance, or relatively high noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>After some searching, it would seem as if this camera uses an APS-C sensor--same as my 40D.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, from personal experience, and from the reviews I have read, it would seem that moving away from Canon or Nikon means putting up with poor low-light performance, or relatively high noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some searching, it would seem as if this camera uses an APS-C sensor&#8211;same as my 40D.</p>
<p>But, from personal experience, and from the reviews I have read, it would seem that moving away from Canon or Nikon means putting up with poor low-light performance, or relatively high noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergur</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>Impressive. And I suppose many will fall for this little charming thing - though I still want my bulky equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive. And I suppose many will fall for this little charming thing &#8211; though I still want my bulky equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergur</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>Impressive. And I suppose many will fall for this little charming thing - though I still want my bulky equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive. And I suppose many will fall for this little charming thing &#8211; though I still want my bulky equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanyan</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll support both - live preview via the rear LCD, and an electronic viewfinder (a smaller LCD where the optical viewfinder usually is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;ll support both &#8211; live preview via the rear LCD, and an electronic viewfinder (a smaller LCD where the optical viewfinder usually is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathanyan</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>nathanyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by a &quot;camera like this&quot;. The NX system will use a larger sensor than the 40D will - given equivalent sensor technologies (though you can&#039;t assume this), you would expect the NX to produce better quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by a &#8220;camera like this&#8221;. The NX system will use a larger sensor than the 40D will &#8211; given equivalent sensor technologies (though you can&#39;t assume this), you would expect the NX to produce better quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeed</title>
		<link>http://www.petapixel.com/2009/12/21/photos-of-the-new-samsung-pseudo-dslr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>eeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petapixel.com/?p=4788#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a great idea, kinda turns the whole DSLR world on it&#039;s head and that&#039;s a good thing. we&#039;re in the digital age now, no reason to have the same restrictions as film. of course those coming from film will have a hard time and i think that&#039;s the true hurdle for this design. KUDOS for taking the risk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#39;s a great idea, kinda turns the whole DSLR world on it&#39;s head and that&#39;s a good thing. we&#39;re in the digital age now, no reason to have the same restrictions as film. of course those coming from film will have a hard time and i think that&#39;s the true hurdle for this design. KUDOS for taking the risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: files.petapixel.com

Served from: www.petapixel.com @ 2012-02-09 20:02:00 -->
