Comments on: Canon Announces the EOS-1D Mark IV http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michael Zhang http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-3077 Michael Zhang Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:49:17 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-3077 Right, but I was basing that statement off what I read elsewhere, like the post I linked to: <a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/lights-out-camera-action/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/light...</a> Right, but I was basing that statement off what I read elsewhere, like the post I linked to: http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/light…

]]> By: Michael Zhang http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-2040 Michael Zhang Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:49:17 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-2040 Right, but I was basing that statement off what I read elsewhere, like the post I linked to: <a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/lights-out-camera-action/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/light...</a> Right, but I was basing that statement off what I read elsewhere, like the post I linked to: http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/light…

]]> By: nathanyan http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-2037 nathanyan Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:29:43 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-2037 And it'd be wrong to suggest the Mark IV will magically have "ridiculous low-light performance" just because it's marketed with a capability to shoot at a certain sensitivity. For all you know, the increased pixel density could render noise performance to be *worse* than that of the 1D3.<br><br>My bet would be that it doesn't match up with the D3s or a hypothetical D700s. And it'd be wrong to suggest the Mark IV will magically have “ridiculous low-light performance” just because it's marketed with a capability to shoot at a certain sensitivity. For all you know, the increased pixel density could render noise performance to be *worse* than that of the 1D3.

My bet would be that it doesn't match up with the D3s or a hypothetical D700s.

]]> By: nathanyan http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-2036 nathanyan Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:27:29 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-2036 The 1D Mark III has a 50-6400 ISO range - it reaches 3200 natively but goes to ISO6400 as a boost. The 1D Mark III has a 50-6400 ISO range – it reaches 3200 natively but goes to ISO6400 as a boost.

]]> By: Michael Zhang http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-2035 Michael Zhang Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:18:04 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-2035 Haha. Maybe in the future :-) Haha. Maybe in the future :-)

]]> By: Bergur http://www.petapixel.com/2009/10/20/canon-announces-the-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-2034 Bergur Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:25:33 +0000 http://www.petapixel.com/?p=3324#comment-2034 How about a give-away, eh? :P How about a give-away, eh? :P

]]>